← All projects
ManufacturingcalculatorEngineering workflow

Round-Bar Nesting and Operator Cutlist

An Excel/VBA planning system that groups bar demand, compares stock plans, generates cutlists, and visualizes standard and optimized nests.

MY FOCUSBuilt the workbook workflow, optimizer logic, status controls, print outputs, and SolidWorks import integration.
ExcelVBAPDF import/exportSolidWorks API

ENGINEERING VALUE

Demonstrates an end-to-end engineering automation workflow from BOM ingestion to purchasing and shop-floor cut instructions.

PROJECT SCOPE

Excel/VBA planning workflow with a working browser counterpart

Explore the project checks ↗
ENGINEERING STUDY / NESTINGJS—02

Engineering concept illustration.

01 / THE PROBLEM

The engineering challenge.

Bar purchasing and cutting need a traceable bridge from BOM rows to stock orders and operator-ready cutting instructions.

02 / CONSTRAINTS

What the solution must consider.

  • Stock length, extra stock, end cleanup, remnants, material/profile isolation, and deterministic results must remain explicit.

03 / ENGINEERING APPROACH

Reasoning before geometry.

01

Engineering method

Normalize stock keys, expand quantities into pieces, solve standard and optimized bar assignments, and preserve traceability back to job/item/part identifiers.

02

Workflow features

14-sheet workflow; Named settings and structured input table; Standard and global optimized nests; Purchase plans; Operator cutlists and visual strips; PDF import/append and print outputs.

04 / DESIGN & IMPLEMENTATION

Connecting intent to execution.

The V04 workbook links grouped demand, stock planning, purchasing and operator cutlists. The browser counterpart adds editable finite inventory and downloadable cutting instructions.

  • 14-sheet workflow
  • Named settings and structured input table
  • Standard and global optimized nests
  • Purchase plans
  • Operator cutlists and visual strips
  • PDF import/append and print outputs

05 / VALIDATION

The checks behind the design.

Engineering workflow

Excel project validation recorded 129 valid pieces, zero quantity or length mismatches, repeatable optimized output and compile/import/print/export passes. End-to-end SolidWorks integration requires separate drawing-session testing. The browser planner passes 126 feasibility and demand-conservation scenarios covering inventory, material/profile groups, exact fits, kerf, trims, unmet demand and CSV output. Its documented saw model and heuristic planning do not establish a global optimum.

129

Validated pieces

Project validation report; measured.

0

Material/profile isolation violations

Project validation report; measured.

06 / OUTCOME

The value of the work.

Demonstrates an end-to-end engineering automation workflow from BOM ingestion to purchasing and shop-floor cut instructions.

THE ENGINEERING PRINCIPLE

Optimize the stock plan without losing the demand record.

A bar plan must preserve profile, material and quantity groups while accounting for stock length, kerf and usable remnants. An efficient nest becomes useful when the operator cutlist and purchase plan agree with the original demand.

A question for a technical conversation

How would you prove that a cutlist preserves every requested piece and never mixes incompatible material groups?

Open the working tool ↗

LET’S BUILD SOMETHING THAT WORKS

Good design belongs
on the shop floor.

Considering a role in mechanical design, manufacturing methods,
fixture design, or estimation? Let’s connect.